Halfway through voting, we’ve decided to show you how the race for Sabbatical positions is shaping up before the official results are announced on Friday night.

We recently published a series of interviews with the candidates for each Sabb role with polls to see how you were voting, reaching almost 1,000 votes between the seven positions. Last year we only got four out of seven right (Unless you count prolific re-runner Anjit), and this year there are even more hotly contested positions.

Union President

president candidates

For Union President, Ben Franklin looks nailed on to win, securing an overwhelming majority in our polls.

president

VP Sports Development

vp sports candidates

VP Sports Development is possibly the hardest race to predict in the entire election, with Jamie Wilson taking a very small lead over the other three candidates.

sports poll

VP Welfare

welfare candidates

Incumbent Equality & Diversity Officer Sam Bailey has taken a resounding lead over the other two candidates, and looks set to be next year’s VP Welfare.

welfare poll

VP DCI

dci candidates

For VP DCI, Kerry Sclater holds a significant lead over her competitor.

dci poll

VP Education

vp education candidates

Lone candidate Shruti Verma leads RON by just one vote in our public poll.

education

VP Student Communities

comms

Veteran campaign-runner Anjit Aulakh leads the way for VP Student Communities.

student comms

VP Engagement

engagement

Jenny Bortoluzzi has a strong lead for VP Engagement.

engagement poll

Think our polls got it all wrong? Let us know in the comments, and find out the official results on Friday night!

17 Comments »

Leave your response!

  • RON
    avatar

    Worst line up for Sabbs in recent SUSU history

    Reply

    Say No to Say No to SUSU
    avatar

    Who are you referring to specifically? For most of the roles there are some really good candidates with proper experience in SUSU for a change and some pretty decent manifestos.

    Reply

    More News
    avatar

    I liked this just for the commenter’s name.

    Reply

  • Cynic
    avatar

    These are not technically “exit polls”, they are just polls. If this was a serious election I’d say that was a significant difference. But since this election is actually just a popularity contest, it may not matter.

    Reply

    Involved student
    avatar

    Don’t cut yourself on that edge

    Reply

    Cynic
    avatar

    Thanks for your concern, my risk assessment was approved by the faculty.

    Reply

  • Be Realistic
    avatar

    These polls represent significantly fewer people than who are actually going to vote, and I expect some people voted on the poll multiple times on multiple devices – don’t count the chickens yet.

    Reply

  • GarbageMan
    avatar

    tbh this year has fewer strikingly obvious clowns than usual, I’m trying to find someone who stands out as a shitter but eh they’re all alright

    Reply

  • Just Sayin’
    avatar

    The SUSU clique remains strong.

    Reply

    Really?
    avatar

    I love that this critique is levied every year, despite the folk involved in the union changing radically with each fresh intake of students.

    Aside from noting that some of the candidates have been really involved in their area of interest/society, not sure how this group is exactly perpetuating the clique.

    Still, haters gonna hate.

    Reply

    Giles
    avatar

    I’ve never fully understood this viewpoint. Of course, people who were part-time officers end up running for full-time (well…except some of us) because they tend to have the experience and expertise. You end up being friendly with each other, as you inevitably end up at a lot of the same events and you tend to bond a lot with others over elections.

    So yeah, it looks like nepotism. Except, of course, all positions are balloted for in a cross-campus election, so anyone could stand and build a campaign team and win. And actually, they would stand a solid chance as anti-clique brigade would probably vote for outliers.

    I’m glad to see that I warrant constant name-dropping in this comment, though, anon. :)

    Reply

    friends
    avatar

    Does being friends because they work a lot together and have got to know each other (just like you and your coursemates/society mates) necessarily equate to a ‘clique’ ?! Because if so I have a pretty big clique back home, please don’t attack them!
    From what I hear, most of the candidates are in each other’s campaign teams
    Also pretty sure Shruti is definitely not best friends with Sophia…

    Reply

    Anonywhat?
    avatar

    Emily?

    Reply

    Emily Shepherd
    avatar

    …what?

    Reply

    Millicent Bystander
    avatar

    People with relevant experience running for sabbatical positions! Well I never!

    I agree with the vote no to susu campaign – let’s have more candidates even if they aren’t people who’ve shown sustained passion for susu and spent time getting to know what the job will entail. Gotta love the hate going round atm 😀

    Reply

  • No but seriously
    avatar

    Wouldn’t you just give up now if you were Sebastian?

    Reply

  • Hmm
    avatar

    Sooooo post results – I think there’s a candidate here that all surprised us and deserves the recognition they are due despite not winning – and it certainly didn’t reflect these polls.

    Reply