The School Of African And Oriental Studies has become the latest university to implement a sales boycott of all Coke products in its student union shops and bars. The move comes in response to the human rights claims against its parent corporation The Coca-Cola Company.
SOAS joins a long line of other institutions in its boycott of Coca-Cola, with the universities of Manchester, Dublin, Sussex, Michigan and Santa Clara being but a few to make a stand against the soft-drinks goliath. The SOAS campaign, headed up by first year student Charles Brook, is made up by members of the Palestine Society. The group does mention, however, that the company’s actions in Palestine (alleged operation of production plants on illegally occupied land) are not the only reason for the boycott, and that there are more general, worldwide concerns.
They point to the alleged use of child labourers in El Salvador, racial discrimination fines in the United States and the supposed intimidation, kidnapping, torture and murder of several union leaders in Columbia and Guatemala. According to Brook, it is these claims that provide the foundations for the university’s boycott.
We hope that the boycott will show that we at SOAS don’t think that a company as unethical as Coca-Cola has a place in our uni and we refuse to be a part of their profits.
The important question for readers of The Tab, however, is whether this boycott is likely to spread to Southampton University. Chloe Green, VP Communities & Welfare, made an attempt in May 2011 to get a similar embargo placed on the sale of Nestlé products due to ethical concerns. Her proposal was rejected. Despite this, it would be worth remembering that SOAS also had more than one rejection of the Coke boycott, yet still succeeded in the end.
Furthermore, Green has very recently passed a business ethics policy which aims to ethically audit all of the SUSU’s business partners by 2015. This means putting in place standards for the purpose of deciding which companies the Union does and does not want to continue working with. When we asked the question, ‘if, hypothetically, the business ethics policy were to be introduced next week, would The Coca-Cola Company’s products be approved for sale and if not, why?’, Sam Ling, Union President answered:
if the policy were to be fully rolled out tomorrow it would be difficult to guess whether or not Coke would be on any sort of banned list. Both the tolerances/banding and the key areas which as a union we put more weight to when it comes to ethics will be determined through consultation and work by the sustainability zone. Because of that it’s impossible to know at this stage what the future decisions would likely be.”
While this may be a vague answer, it is not hard to read between the lines. Unless there were a drastic withdrawal of all claims against Coca-Cola, the allegations against them would, in all likelihood, lead to their withdrawal from sale at the Union. Accusations involving murder, kidnap and child labour, even if not proven, go a long way in ethical audits. In addition to this, it would also be worth considering what other companies may fall foul of the new business ethics policy. Nestlé, for example, would find themselves right in the firing line considering that the new ethics policy was initiated by Green, the same person who had her Nestlé boycott proposal rejected two years ago.
What do you think? Is Coca-Cola as boycott-able as Nestlé? Let us know in comments.
Team Soton race their way to success
Preview: 2014 Varsity Cup
WHATSOC? FifaSoc!
Vixens Outfox The Competition
Oh yay – once again an attempt by SUSU to tell the student body what they can and can’t eat and drink. But then again, we’re all too stupid to have an informed choice, the powers that be must choose!
On another note I’d love to see the SUSU shop if they banned Coke and Nestle, it’d have about 5 things in it and go bust!
Reply
Hi. When have SUSU said they’re going to ban coke? This discussion has never been bought up. The big part of SUSU’s ethics policy was moving away from banning things. Banning things is not the way forward. In my personal opinion I cannot see SUSU banning stocks of coca-cola in their outlets.
Reply
Supporting, financing or in any way encouraging the kind of behaviour these allegations imply is in no way justifiable; ergo neither is the sale of their products. What makes this a difficult or complex notion?
What is beyond me is why we are even asking the question of whether or not to boycott.
Reply
stop using my name, it was original man.
Reply
Don’t say were going to have to go through the same rubbish as the Nestle ‘boycott’
Reply
“Dad i want a bottle of coke with my name on it”
“Just have a Pepsi, Max”
Reply
Vague answer? Sam’s answer is complete non-sense
Reply
I completely agree with you on the quote making no sense. Unfortunately the article has taken a small snippet from a longer explanation on the basics for how the policy would work. Our of context the quote is nonsense.
Reply
You could consider releasing the whole statement and linking to it here for those interested.
Reply
If only there was another more ethical cola the Union could stock!
Like that one endorsed by Desmond Tutu (Ubuntu Cola) which they pulled from the shelves after stocking it for about 2 months….
Reply
Ubuntu cola while ethically sound tasted like raw chicken skin. I think if they take coke off the shelves I’ll stop drinking it rather than moving to nasty alternatives.
Reply
actually there’s Fentiman’s cola, botanically brewed in the UK, it’s stocked in quite a few places
Reply
I just want to reply to the end of the article about Nestle being in the firing line because this policy was put forward by Chloe. This is entirely untrue. As part of this business ethics policy we are looking for an auditing organisation where the criteria that we audit against are chosen by the student body. This means that we are auditing our suppliers etc. based on the criteria that the student body care about. If you want a say on what we audit then make sure you get involved in the discussion about auditing criteria.
Reply
“Auditing organisation” – which will be comprised now doubt of a vocal minority who want to force their beliefs onto the vast majority. I dispair sometimes at the patronising tone of student unions – why don’t you lot just join Labour already?
Reply
Boycott Coke, I saw a internet docu-film on the youtubes, and it showed the coking factories in Indonesia where they coke all the local goats. It was horrible to see the goats hanging from the ceilings over the coking machine. I swear, during the close-up of the goats face, we shared in a moment of empathetic sadness. I’d never drink coke again if I wasn’t viciously addicted to glucose and syrupy goodness.
Reply
yes: reasons
1) they don’t have my name on any bottles (feel really left out as I’ve been unable to load an image of it to my social networking account), 2) pepsi ftw and 3) their current guilt tripping advertising campaigns really annoy me.
Reply